Politics & Governance / Pakistan

PTI rejects DG ISPR's criticism of party, calls KP security criticism 'regrettable'

On 7 January 2026, PTI and KP CM Sohail Afridi pushed back against DG ISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry's recent criticism, urging policy change over a new KP military operation.

A wide night-time view of the illuminated Pakistan Parliament House in Islamabad, with its central dome flanked by lower wings and reflecting pools in the foreground.
ARCHIVAL CONTEXT The Parliament House in Islamabad, the seat of Pakistan's federal legislature and the institutional backdrop to the 7 January 2026 PTI–ISPR exchange; the photograph does not depict any person named in this article. Photo: Waqas.usman, Public Domain.

What PTI said on 7 January 2026

Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) issued a statement on 7 January 2026 pushing back against criticism from ISPR Director General Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, who had used a 6 January press conference to accuse the “political party in power in Pakistan in 2021” of “internally facilitating terrorists” and to question its opposition to a new KP military operation. Dawn’s News Desk reported that PTI termed the criticism “regrettable” and accused the spokesperson of singling out a single party and a provincial government.

In its statement, the party said consistent criticism “not only escalates political temperatures but also raises questions about the balance of the state apparatus”. It rejected the framing that opposition to a KP military operation amounted to support for terrorists, recalling that a PTI-led peace jirga on 12 November 2025 had “unanimously resolved that a military operation is not a sustainable solution”. PTI also objected to the DG’s claim that terrorists did not target the party, calling it contrary to ground realities.

What the KP chief minister demanded

KP Chief Minister Sohail Afridi escalated the dispute separately. He said opposition to a possible military operation was not limited to PTI and that “all political and religious parties of KP” agreed military operations are not a long-term solution. Afridi pointed to 22 military operations and roughly 14,000 intelligence-based operations in the province without eliminating terrorism, and said “serious flaws in policymaking” made a policy shift inevitable. He asked whether the federal government had guarantees that a new operation would deliver lasting peace.

The parallel advice from the prime minister’s adviser

The pushback was echoed by Prime Minister’s Adviser on Political Affairs Rana Sanaullah, the Express Tribune reported. He urged PTI to abandon its “hostile stance” towards the state, warning that continued confrontation could undermine party founder Imran Khan’s political influence, destabilise the KP government and erode his public support. He said democratic leadership required compromise, not perpetual confrontation.

What remains uncertain

The federal government’s formal response had not been put on the record by the editorial cutoff. PTI had not said whether it would accept a dialogue invitation, and the ISPR had not commented on the KP CM’s policy-shift call. Whether the criticism escalates or de-escalates remains to be seen in the days after the exchange.

Sources & reporting notes

This is a synthesis of published material, not eyewitness reporting. Sources were reviewed on 7 January 2026.

  1. Dawn — PTI pushes back against criticism of party leadership, policies7 January 2026 · Primary, day-of report by Dawn's News Desk, drawing on PTI and KP CM Sohail Afridi statements on X and the 6 January DG ISPR press conference.
  2. The Express Tribune — Sanaullah urges PTI to drop 'hostile approach'7 January 2026 · Independent Pakistan newspaper of record, day-of report on PM adviser Rana Sanaullah's interview with a private TV channel.
  3. Dawn — DG ISPR says Afghans involved in major terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 20256 January 2026 · Context, the marathon DG ISPR press conference that triggered the 7 January PTI and KP CM pushback.